|
If we use this
battery in a utility application such as diurnal wind shifting
(shifting low value wind energy captured during the nighttime in
a battery, and then dispatching this energy during high value
periods) we might value the energy stored in the battery at $50/MWh
(wind energy stored at $10/MWh and dispatched at $60/MWh).
Therefore the total value of energy stored in the battery during
it's lifetime would be only $40,000 (800 MWh at $50/MWh).
While other utility applications for energy storage may provide
a higher revenue value on energy, it is clear that the cycle
life of a battery is a primary limiting feature for utility use.
Note that we have ignored many factors here, including battery
efficiency and the cost of required power conditioning
equipment.
Why
Most Plate Batteries Have Limited Cycle Life.
|
Plate
batteries include virtually all the lead acid, lithium
ion, nickel cadmium, nickel metal hydride and other
batteries used today for large scale energy storage.
A plate type battery is a battery where the "active
material" - the chemicals that actually store electrical
energy, are pasted into a 'grid', to form the plate.
A
batteries active material is generally a pasty, crumbly
material, often of relatively high resistance, that is
unfit to produce strong, rigid, low resistance
electrodes. Therefore the active material is
pressed into spaces in the grid, which supplies the
rigidity and current conductors to pass the electrical
energy out of the battery. Most batteries are
constructed of many plates, to allow a large surface
area between active material and the surrounding
electrolytes, as is shown here.
The 'active material' of a battery changes composition
upon discharge. For example, the positive material
of a standard lead acid battery is Lead Dioxide, PbO2.
During discharge the PbO2 reacts with the sulfuric acid
in the electrolyte to form PbSO4, or Lead Sulfate.
Now, PbO2 and PbSO4 are molecules of different sizes,
such that the active material pockets within the grid
literally swell and shrink with each charge and
discharge cycle, loosening the active materials
connection to the grid, among other issues. In a
Lithium Ion battery, the mechanism is in some ways
different, as a grid type electrode is not required,
however the insertion of Lithium Ions into the graphite
electrode causes a 10% size change with each cycle, and
this morphological change eventually damages the
electrode. These
mechanical size changes, while not the only degradation
mechanisms within a battery, are generally the most degrading, and limits the cycle life of almost all plate
type batteries. |
Exceptions - Plate Batteries with Some Utility Value.
|
A
few plate batteries have high enough cycle life to be of
value in utility applications. One example is the
Nano Titanate technology championed by
Altair-Nano.
In this technology, the active material is contained in
a spherical crystalline form that does not change
morphology (shape or size) during the charge discharge
cycle, removing that important path for cycling degradation.
The result is a highly increased cycling capability.
For
different (and somewhat arcane) reasons, the lithium
chemistry of Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4) has a much
higher cycle life than other lithium chemistries,
providing for as much as 7000 100% DOD cycles. The
most well known manufacturer using this chemistry is
A123 Systems,
who is widely expected to be a major player in future
electric vehicle battery, HEV, and PHEV markets.
Both of these technologies are relatively expensive, but
because of their advantages over other plate batteries
are being marketed for utility applications.
Altair Nano is actively marketing into frequency
regulation utility applications, and A123 Systems has
been funded by the DOE to provide a large scale 8MW/32MWh battery for Southern
California Edison.
|
The
Evolving World of New Technology Batteries.
|
As the price
of battery energy storage plummets, the market for
energy storage will soar. Which battery design or
set of designs will take advantage of this huge market
opportunity is not known. However, here are some
of the contenders:
Sodium
Beta / Sodium Sulfur / Aqueous Sodium
Imagine a battery that doesn't even start working until
it is around 600F, hotter than the broiler in your oven.
Containing molten Sulfur and Sodium, this would not at
first glance seem an ideal choice for battery
technology, especially if you remember that Sodium metal
will generally ignite spontaneously just from the water
vapor in air. However, Sodium Sulfur, or "NaS"
batteries are the most successful of the new technology
batteries, and are now being used in utilities in the
USA and more in Japan, Europe and the Middle East.
Sold presently only by
NGK
Insulators of Japan, these batteries have a cycle
life of 2500 100% DOD or 4500 80% DOD cycles.
Another high-temperature liquid Sodium battery is the
Zebra battery manufactured by MES-DEA of Switzerland.
Using Nickel Chloride instead of Sulfur, the Zebra
battery could be safer, run at a somewhat lower
temperature, and, given all the valuable Nickel metal in
it, would provide some revenue on recycling.
Presently, Zebra is only being sold into motive power
applications.
A recent article on
Ceramatec, describes how they are working on a
'warm' NaS battery, where the Sodium would stay solid at
an operating temperature of a mere 200F. This
advance could make NaS batteries extremely competitive
in the utility storage world.
Even more interesting is technology for a safe, low-cost
sodium-ion battery system coming out of Carnegie Mellon
University, and recently funded by the DOE at $10
million. This technology is run at room
temperature with an aqueous sodium (basically sea water)
electrolyte, and, if high cycle life can be obtained,
could represent a winning solution.
Zinc-Air / Metal-Air Batteries
When you drive your car, you are combusting the
hydrocarbons in your gas tank with oxygen in the outside
air to produce CO2 and H2O. If you had to carry the
oxygen around with you instead of getting it free from
the outside air, your cars would have to be much, much bigger.
In fact, to combust the 20 gallons of gas in your gas
tank requires the oxygen in more than 1.5 tons of air,
as much air as fills (uncompressed) roughly 10 suburban
houses.
The potential advantage for Metal-Air batteries is
similar to that for gasoline in that you only have to store
one reactant. The other reactant, Oxygen, you
get for free from the air around. In the case of Zinc-Air, however, no
net gasses are produced as the battery stores and then
releases Oxygen during the charge/discharge cycle.
The reactant metal, Zinc for example, is plated or
accumulates on an electrode in a Zinc-Air cell during
the charging phase, and is turned back into Zinc ions in
solution during the discharge phase. Metal Air
cells have at least the potential of virtually unlimited
cyclability.
An important note is that IBM announced in August of
2009 a major effort to develop a Lithium-Air battery,
which has the potential of producing 'serious' electric
vehicle batteries, batteries with an energy density
sufficient to power a car for 400 miles. While it
is unlikely that this will produce a cost effective
utility scale battery, it is an effort worth following.
A major advance in Metal Air batteries is being funded
by the DOE to Arizona State spin off Fluidic Energy.
The advance here is the potential use of Ionic Liquids as electrolyte. Ionic liquids, different from water, won't evaporate out the air cathode or air membrane that is required in a Metal-Air battery. They also don't electrolysize into Hydrogen and Oxygen as water does in the presence of high-voltage electrodes. This means that potentially higher-energy metals than Zinc may be used, increasing the energy density dramatically.
Flow Batteries
A flow battery cell is constructed of two halves, the
cathode side and the anode side, each containing an
electrode for conducting current in and out of the cell,
with the halves being separated by a membrane.
Two
tanks of electrolyte, the catholyte and the anolyte (you
can guess which tank connects to which side of the cell)
are connected to the cell such that the electrolytes are
pumped into the cell during discharge and recharge.
In a flow battery cell, the active material is floating
in the electrolyte, not pasted into an electrode grid.
Flow batteries are known as "Redox" batteries, as during
discharge, the reactant in one side of the cell is
reduced (adds an electron), while the other is oxidized
(loses an electron). Since both reactions happen
in solution, the physical change to reactant sizes has
no effect on electrodes, and therefore flow battery
cells could have extremely long or even unlimited cycle
life.
In addition, power and energy are decoupled in certain
types of flow cells. The power (MW) rating being
determined primarily by the amount of cell electrode
surface area and associated power conditioning
equipment, and the energy (MWh) rating being determined
by the amount of electrolyte. So, for certain
types of flow batteries, more MWh is mostly a matter of
larger
electrolyte tanks.
The following are different types of flow batteries,
each of which has their own benefits and issues.
Iron Chromium Flow Battery
First developed by NASA during the Apollo Program, Iron
Chromium (FeCr) has the benefit of using relatively
benign chemicals, and could represent the safest type of
flow battery available. Also, electrolyte chillers
are not necessarily required (as in Zinc Bromine), and
the active materials are relatively inexpensive and
widely available.
Some primary issues with FeCr are the fact that there
are different reactants in each half of the cell, such
that transfer of one reactant (for example Chromium
ions) through the membrane results in a permanent loss
of capacity. This transfer might happen due to
inefficient or damaged membranes. Another issue is
that the energy density of FeCr is low, requiring much
larger electrolyte tanks than some other flow battery
systems.
Iron Chromium is presently being sold into mostly
Telecom applications by
Deeya Energy,
and is also being developed for utility applications by
various startups.
Zinc Bromine Flow Battery
Zinc Bromine is considered a "hybrid flow battery", as
during the charging process, Zinc metal is directly
plated on the anode electrode. This means that the
power/energy relationship in a Zinc Bromine flow battery
is more fixed than some other flow battery systems, as
the total energy available in a system is limited by the
available electrode area for plating Zinc. Zinc
Bromine is, along with Vanadium Flow batteries, the most
studied flow battery system for utility applications,
and is actively being manufactured and sold into utility
applications by two companies.
Zinc Bromine has a relatively high energy density, and
uses relatively inexpensive and widely available
reactants. Bromine gas is a serious health hazard,
but in the most common designs the elemental Bromine is complexed
during the charging process into a material with a much
lower vapor pressure, making it much less hazardous.
Issues with Zinc Bromine flow batteries include growth
of dendrites on the anode during Zinc plating (tree like
spikes of Zinc metal which can pierce membranes and
cause shorting), and the need for large electrolyte
chillers to improve efficiency and to reduce the
potential of Bromine gas production. Some
manufacturers claim unlimited cyclability (30 year
life), while others state that a small degradation of
capacity happens with cyclability on the Bromine side
electrode.
Zinc Bromine flow batteries are presently being produced
in individual packages as large as 500KW/2.8MWh, and are
being produced by
ZBB Energy, and
Premium Power.
Other companies in pre-production are also working on
Zinc Bromine flow systems.
Vanadium Flow Battery
Vanadium flow batteries are another 'true' flow battery,
which has been studied extensively and has been used in
a few utility applications. A Vanadium flow
battery uses the same reactants on both sides of the
cell, and so does not suffer from the ionic transfer
issues of Iron Chromium. It also has potentially
the highest efficiency of any flow battery design, and a
relatively high energy density as well.
The cost of the Vanadium based reactants is higher than
that of FeCr or Zinc Bromine above, and there are
questions as to safety. While the Vanadium flow
battery electrolyte itself is not terribly dangerous,
the Vanadium PentaOxide used in one part of the
electrolyte is very poisonous in powder form (should a
spill occur that dries to powder).
Utility scale Vanadium flow batteries are presently
being offered by the Chinese company
Prudent Energy,
and are also being developed by several pre-production
companies.
|
|